One of the persistent challenges in peace studies is the gap between research and policy. Academic research often remains confined to journals and conferences, while policymakers operate under time constraints and political pressures. Bridging this gap is essential for translating knowledge into action.
Peace research generates insights into conflict dynamics, risk factors, and intervention outcomes. However, for these insights to inform policy, they must be communicated clearly and accessibly. Research institutions play a crucial role by producing policy briefs, executive summaries, and targeted recommendations.
Engagement with policymakers should be continuous rather than episodic. Trust is built over time through consistent, credible analysis. When decision-makers view research institutions as reliable sources of evidence, they are more likely to integrate findings into policy design.
At the same time, peace researchers must understand policy realities. This includes budget constraints, political trade-offs, and institutional limitations. Effective peace research does not ignore these factors but incorporates them into realistic recommendations.
In Nigeria and across Africa, the stakes are high. Policies related to security, governance, and development have direct implications for peace. Research-informed policy can help prevent escalation, allocate resources more effectively, and support inclusive governance.
By acting as a bridge between knowledge and power, peace studies institutions enhance the quality of decision-making. This intermediary role is not about advocacy, but about ensuring that policies are grounded in evidence rather than assumption.